Abstract
Background: Human exposure to nanomaterials (NMs) and metal(loid)s rarely occurs in isolation, yet toxicological studies still predominantly assess single substances. Co-exposure scenarios may alter both the magnitude and the type of DNA damage induced. The Comet and the γ-H2AX assays represent complementary approaches for detecting DNA damage and DNA double-strand breaks, respectively, providing insight into genotoxic responses.
Aim: This study investigated the genotoxic effects of NMs and metal(oid)s under single and binary co-exposure conditions, evaluating whether the latter alters the extent and nature of DNA damage.
Methods: Two human cell models (A549 and HepG2) representing distinct target tissues were exposed to individual contaminants and binary mixtures. Primary DNA damage and oxidative lesions were assessed using a medium-throughput Comet assay and its FPG-modified version. DNA double-strand breaks were evaluated through quantification of γ-H2AX formation by flow cytometry. Responses following single and combined exposures were compared to identify potential interaction patterns.
Results: Single exposures to metal(loid)s resulted in marked increases in primary DNA damage, while NMs alone induced modest and cell-type-dependent effects (more pronounced in HepG2 cells). Co-exposure responses differed between cell models but frequently resulted in enhanced primary DNA damage relative to NMs exposures alone. In contrast, γ-H2AX analysis revealed that co-exposure generally reduced double-strand break formation compared with the corresponding single metal(loid) exposures, particularly in A549 cells, whereas HepG2 showed intermediate responses. These findings suggest that co-exposure may modify the severity and mechanisms of DNA damage, potentially shifting responses toward less severe lesion types. Some co-exposure conditions also indicated reduced oxidative DNA damage compared with exposure to single compounds.
Conclusions: The use of complementary genotoxicity biomarkers demonstrates that co-exposure can modulate both the extent and the nature of DNA damage. These results highlight the importance of incorporating co-exposure scenarios and multiple mechanistic endpoints in environmental mutagenesis and risk assessment studies.
Funding: This work was supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P., through project MixIng-Tox with reference 2022.03491.PTDC, and also projects with references UID/4750/2025, LA/P/0064/2020, UIDB/50011/2020, and LA/P/0006/2020, Ministry of Science and Innovation MCIN/AEI Grant PID2024-160400OB-I00, and Xunta de Galicia (ED431B 2025/26). A.T. Reis thanks the support of Horizon Europe Framework Programme under Grant Agreements No. 101057014 and No. 101157269. C.B. Lopes thanks the support of FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. for researcher contract with DOI identifier 10.54499/2021.03739.CEECIND/CP1659/CT002.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Spanish Journal of Environmental Mutagenesis and Genomics
